Many days since my last post, and very little language about practice in the last month. I just read my friend Craig's latest post, and my friend Josh's post, and now I see a small aperture into explaining the lull.
In nursing this injury for the last month, I have been waiting. The injury has fluctuated between good, better, not-so-good, and downright awful (not necessarily in that order). And I have been staying calm. As if this nursing time were a middle space between then and when-it-heals, I have been floating and treating my body as if it were a rental car — the loaner that I'm using until my car it out of the shop. The calm is not the result of some super zen-like awareness; it's come not from a letting go, but rather from a faith that the injury will heal, a belief that this middle space is temporary, a detachment from the now and an eye on the future, a nagging fear of losing the practice, and an old voice telling me to push through it. This kind of perspective has its merits. Recently, for example, I tripped over the story about the Brits' propaganda, "Keep Calm and Carry On," during WWII. I get it, I can see how it works, I am inspired by it.
But the real challenge is to keep calm, carry on, and be okay with the now. Modify, expand, see the windows that are opening even though it seems like a door is closing, re-evaluate, stand still and listen and breathe — all in the face of anxiety, trepidation, confusion. As much as I have talked about learning what is to be learned in this, I haven't been listening quite closely enough; I've been nodding my head and agreeing — yes, yes, this is an important time of growth — and still yearning for it to go away. I've been calm, I've breathed through some of the frustration...but I'm not breathing enough, not watching closely enough, not listening. I haven't seen the very physical realness of this: the body is not a loaner. It is IT. In some ways, it's a kind of reverse-pratyahara...it's a time to hear the body, not let go of what it is saying.
I am blessed to have two amazing teachers, one of whom gave me a stern talking-to yesterday. She saw me pushing my body through the pain, and she asked me after practice, "What're you doing? And why?" I explained that I was worried that the practice would go away if I modified. She reminded me that the practice will not go away, that practice is a lifelong relationship, and — surprisingly — that revitalization will happen even as the body gets older. She talked about how Ashtanga can hook the type-A practitioner, but that the practice is at its core not type-A. It's brilliant that way. It attracts many, many kinds of people; for the one who competes with herself, who doesn't understand moderation, who is only now negotiating who she is in the practice (rather than what she should be), Ashtanga is alluring and perfect. If one is willing, humility comes instantly. If one is really willing, humility leads to self-nurturing.
My teacher told me that this injury is trying to teach me something. I don't know the whole message, but I do know that part of it is that I have a lot to learn about the undertow of the ego and the intricate layering of the practice. I know that it's possible that I may be thankful for this injury. The practice will be here for you, she assured me. Let go. The most powerful lesson that I have learned this week is that letting go does not mean letting go of the practice; it means moving deeper into it by making space in it. Modifying does not mean limiting; it means opening, caring for the body while it heals, practicing around it like a cocoon around a delicate form of life. What I have seen this week is that the practice is not dark, not subterranean, but actually surprisingly well-lit if we are willing to see and feel our way in.
But the real challenge is to keep calm, carry on, and be okay with the now. Modify, expand, see the windows that are opening even though it seems like a door is closing, re-evaluate, stand still and listen and breathe — all in the face of anxiety, trepidation, confusion. As much as I have talked about learning what is to be learned in this, I haven't been listening quite closely enough; I've been nodding my head and agreeing — yes, yes, this is an important time of growth — and still yearning for it to go away. I've been calm, I've breathed through some of the frustration...but I'm not breathing enough, not watching closely enough, not listening. I haven't seen the very physical realness of this: the body is not a loaner. It is IT. In some ways, it's a kind of reverse-pratyahara...it's a time to hear the body, not let go of what it is saying.
I am blessed to have two amazing teachers, one of whom gave me a stern talking-to yesterday. She saw me pushing my body through the pain, and she asked me after practice, "What're you doing? And why?" I explained that I was worried that the practice would go away if I modified. She reminded me that the practice will not go away, that practice is a lifelong relationship, and — surprisingly — that revitalization will happen even as the body gets older. She talked about how Ashtanga can hook the type-A practitioner, but that the practice is at its core not type-A. It's brilliant that way. It attracts many, many kinds of people; for the one who competes with herself, who doesn't understand moderation, who is only now negotiating who she is in the practice (rather than what she should be), Ashtanga is alluring and perfect. If one is willing, humility comes instantly. If one is really willing, humility leads to self-nurturing.
My teacher told me that this injury is trying to teach me something. I don't know the whole message, but I do know that part of it is that I have a lot to learn about the undertow of the ego and the intricate layering of the practice. I know that it's possible that I may be thankful for this injury. The practice will be here for you, she assured me. Let go. The most powerful lesson that I have learned this week is that letting go does not mean letting go of the practice; it means moving deeper into it by making space in it. Modifying does not mean limiting; it means opening, caring for the body while it heals, practicing around it like a cocoon around a delicate form of life. What I have seen this week is that the practice is not dark, not subterranean, but actually surprisingly well-lit if we are willing to see and feel our way in.

Rebecca,
ReplyDeleteYour post has lots of great insight (as usual) and is very eloquent (also as usual). It took me a few reads to absorb, and I love your distinction between the different versions of self-acceptance of an injury, the second one obviously much more profound.
“It attracts many, many kinds of people; for the one who competes with herself, who doesn't understand moderation, who is only now negotiating who she is in the practice (rather than what she should be), Ashtanga is alluring and perfect.”
I wonder if one of the messages of Ashtanga is that there is not a place where you “should” be. Rather, the struggle is to recognize that you are already there, that you are already perfect. And that this is self-acceptance. Maybe?
I can so easily visualize your conversation with K. It makes me smile. She’s tough, eh? I love her classes.
Josh's suggestion about self-acceptance and "already [being] perfect" brings to mind Gregor Maehle's writings, in his first book on the Primary Series, on Yoga Sutra 1.12: "[Yoga is achieved] through practice and attachment." He says that "if we only practice, then we tend to develop beliefs like 'Our practice is the only correct practice,' 'Only Ashtanga Yoga is the correct yoga,' 'Only Mysore style is the correct form for a yoga class.' ... All these statements have in common the belief that there is one truth that excludes all others. ... It prevents us from recognizing that a postiion different from out own valid view could also be right. It is a trap of the mind, which believes to have figured out reality by imposing a particular extreme reality tunnel on it." Thus, it is this extreme focus on practice that, I believe, has generated this cult-like reverence for "traditional" Ashtanga, the existance of which, as many of us know, is unclear.
ReplyDeleteOn the flip side, Maehle says, "We fall into the opposite trap...if we do not practice but only apply detachment. We develop beliefs like 'All paths lead to the same goal,' 'It's all yoga,' ... and 'All statements, philosophies, and religions are valid.'" While that last one could easily cause much political debate, it illustrates the trap that Maehle is building to. He says that "these statements have in common the belief that there are many truths, that cancel out the one truth. ... According to [this] attitude, I don't have to change because I am okay as I am." He says it "makes us impossible for us to recognize wrong views".
So, Josh, I'm not sure that there isn't a place where you "'should' be". Maybe in any particular asana, but perhaps not in general. Does the self-acceptance you propose and that so many yoga teachers in the West love to preach in their feel-good, yoga-for-the-masses classes contradict the Yoga Sutras? It seems like it to me. And after all, if you are okay as you are--if you are already perfect--why bother doing yoga?
Maehle has a compromise. Since the extrreme relativism that is brought about by detachment "is a trap of the mind ... Reality according to yoga is not to be found in either extreme of the mind. It is to be found resting in the center." We must, therefore, apply both practice and detachment.
As with so many things, it seems that moderation, or creating balance--yang and yin, if you like--is key.
Maehle, Gregor. Ashtanga Yoga : Practice and Philosophy. Novato, California: New World Library, 2006. Print.
(Sorry, Rebecca and the Citation Police; not sure how to italicize in a comment.)
"Change, when it comes, cracks everything open."-Dorothy Allison
ReplyDeleteFrank and Josh...thank you so much for these posts. I think you are both right. I love the idea that we are already "perfect"; not the "perfection" of it, but rather that we are what we are in the moment. I don't know that it suggests that we shouldn't improve; I think it might just mean that we can't do more than what we're trying our best to do. And, Frank, I agree with you, too...effort and ease, exertion and release, practice and detachment. The contested spaces between those dialectics, I think, is as close to perfection as we might get. Maybe?
ReplyDeleteAnd, Kim...Allison's words are so beautiful. And they come at a wonderful time. My students and I have just finished reading/watching _Angels in America_ — Allison's words capture the soul of that play. xo
Hi, all...
ReplyDeleteI am just after reading Kino's monthly newsletter, in which she writes:
"Only when you tune into the place within where you are already happy and content will enjoy the ride of life regardless of where you perceive yourself to be along the road."
MacGregor, Kino. "Miami Life Center Newsletter: May." Miami Life Center: 2010.
Dealing with my various injuries has certainly opened a new chapter in my practice. It seems to be as difficult as the asana practice but, I think, has mch more potential. And I agree with Josh, K is tough.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your post Rebeca it's wonderful.